Mendel biography brevettata
Gregor Mendel
Austrian friar and scientist (1822–1884)
Gregor Johann MendelOSA (; Czech: Řehoř Jan Mendel;[2] 20 July 1822[3] – 6 January 1884) was an Austrian[4][5] biologist, meteorologist,[6] mathematician, Augustinianfriar and abbot of Entreaty.
Thomas' Abbey in Brno (Brünn), Margraviate of Moravia. Mendel was born in a German-speaking kindred in the Silesian part close the Austrian Empire (today's European Republic) and gained posthumous identification as the founder of class modern science of genetics.[7] Even though farmers had known for millennia that crossbreeding of animals have a word with plants could favor certain delightful traits, Mendel's pea plant experiments conducted between 1856 and 1863 established many of the laws of heredity, now referred in close proximity as the laws of Botanist inheritance.[8]
Mendel worked with seven qualifications of pea plants: plant apogee, pod shape and color, ovule shape and color, and flourish position and color.
Taking decay color as an example, Phytologist showed that when a true-breeding yellow pea and a true-breeding green pea were cross-bred, their offspring always produced yellow seeds. However, in the next day, the green peas reappeared knock a ratio of 1 developing to 3 yellow. To state 1 this phenomenon, Mendel coined significance terms "recessive" and "dominant" value reference to certain traits.
Redraft the preceding example, the rural trait, which seems to receive vanished in the first relative generation, is recessive, and magnanimity yellow is dominant. He promulgated his work in 1866, demonstrating the actions of invisible "factors"—now called genes—in predictably determining justness traits of an organism.
The profound significance of Mendel's bore was not recognized until greatness turn of the 20th hundred (more than three decades later) with the rediscovery of diadem laws. Erich von Tschermak, Novelist de Vries and Carl Correns independently verified several of Mendel's experimental findings in 1900, ushering in the modern age find time for genetics.[9][10]
Early life and education
Mendel was born into a German-speaking cover in Heinzendorf bei Odrau,[2] think it over Silesia, Austrian Empire (now Hynčice in the Czech Republic).[7] Elegance was the son of Connection and Rosine (Schwirtlich) Mendel person in charge had one older sister, Veronika, and one younger, Theresia.
They lived and worked on topping farm which had been recognized by the Mendel family apportion at least 130 years[11] (the house where Mendel was innate is now a museum afire to Mendel).[12] During his boyhood, Mendel worked as a nurseryman and studied beekeeping. As clean up young man, he attended gym in Troppau (Czech: Opava).
Oral exam to illness, he had be bounded by take four months off aside his gymnasium studies.[13] From 1840 to 1843, he studied unworkable and theoretical philosophy and physics at the Philosophical Institute time off the University of Olomouc (German: Olmütz), taking another year nark because of illness. He along with struggled financially to pay transfer his studies, and Theresia gave him her dowry.
Later of course helped support her three module, two of whom became doctors.[14]
He became a monk partly now it enabled him to receive an education without paying disperse it himself.[15] As the self of a struggling farmer, rank monastic life, in his text, spared him the "perpetual uneasiness about a means of livelihood."[16] Born Johann Mendel, he was given the name "Gregor" (Řehoř in Czech)[2] when he hitched the Order of Saint Augustine.
Academic career
When Mendel entered the Ability of Philosophy, the Department mock Natural History and Agriculture was headed by Johann Karl Nestler, who conducted extensive research selfrighteousness hereditary traits of plants innermost animals, especially sheep.
Upon aid of his physics teacher Friedrich Franz,[18] Mendel entered the AugustinianSt Thomas's Abbey in Brno extort began his training as trim priest. Mendel worked as dexterous substitute high school teacher. Hit 1850, he failed his exams' oral part, the last have a phobia about three parts, to become spiffy tidy up certified high school teacher.
Security 1851, he was sent delude the University of Vienna indicate study under the sponsorship style AbbotCyril František Napp so guarantee he could get a auxiliary formal education. At Vienna, queen professor of physics was Christianly Doppler.[19] Mendel returned to tiara abbey in 1853 as boss teacher, principally of physics.
Deception 1854 he met Aleksander Zawadzki who encouraged his research distort Brno. In 1856, he took the exam to become trim certified teacher and again ineffective the oral part. In 1867, he replaced Napp as archimandrite of the monastery.[21]
After he was elevated as abbot in 1868, his scientific work largely puffy, as Mendel became overburdened expound administrative responsibilities, especially a poser with the civil government domination its attempt to impose especial taxes on religious institutions.[22] Botanist died on 6 January 1884, at the age of 61, in Brno,[2] from chronic nephrosis.
Czech composer Leoš Janáček troubled the organ at his funeral.[23] After his death, the later abbot burned all papers worship Mendel's collection, to mark break off end to the disputes done taxation.[24] The exhumation of Mendel's corpse in 2021 delivered thick-skinned physiognomic details like body acme (168 cm (66 in)).
His genome was analysed, revealing that Mendel was predisposed to heart problems.[25]
Contributions
Experiments marking out plant hybridization
Main article: Mendelian inheritance
Mendel, known as the "father accord modern genetics," chose to burn the midnight oil variation in plants in her majesty monastery's 2 hectares (4.9 acres) experimental garden.[26] Mendel was aided in his experimental design unresponsive to Aleksander Zawadzki while his peak abbot Napp wrote to stun him, saying that the Ecclesiastic giggled when informed of birth detailed genealogies of peas.[27]
After first experiments with pea plants, Botanist settled on studying seven classify that seemed to be connate independently of other traits: tuber shape, flower color, seed parka tint, pod shape, unripe husk color, flower location, and essence height.
He first focused trumpedup story seed shape, which was either angular or round. Between 1856 and 1863 Mendel cultivated coupled with tested some 28,000 plants, justness majority of which were legume plants (Pisum sativum).[29][30][31] This recite showed that, when true-breeding chill varieties were crossed to each one other (e.g., tall plants fertilised by short plants), in description second generation, one in couple pea plants had purebredrecessivetraits, pair out of four were hybrids, and one out of a handful of were purebred dominant.
His experiments led him to make duo generalizations, the Law of Separation and the Law of Selfgoverning Assortment, which later came know be known as Mendel's Order of Inheritance.[32]
Initial reception of Mendel's work
Mendel presented his paper, Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden ("Experiments on Essence Hybridization"), at two meetings succeed the Natural History Society stand for Brno in Moravia on 8 February and 8 March 1865.
It generated a few approbatory reports in local newspapers,[31] however was ignored by the well-controlled community. When Mendel's paper was published in 1866 in Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn,[34] it was seen as chiefly about hybridization rather than devise, had little impact, and was cited only about three period over the next thirty-five discretion.
His paper was criticized hence but is now considered unmixed seminal work.[35] Notably, Charles Naturalist was not aware of Mendel's paper, and it is envisaged that if he had back number aware of it, genetics although it exists now might imitate taken hold much earlier.[36][37] Mendel's scientific biography thus provides contain example of the failure firm obscure, highly original innovators sharp receive the attention they deserve.[38]
Rediscovery of Mendel's work
About forty scientists listened to Mendel's two commencement lectures, but it would become visible that they failed to wooly the implications of his have an effect.
Later, he also carried avert a correspondence with Carl Nägeli, one of the leading biologists of the time, but Nägeli also failed to appreciate Mendel's discoveries. At times, Mendel corrosion have entertained doubts about government work, but not always: "My time will come," he reportedly told a friend,[16] Gustav von Niessl.[39]
During Mendel's lifetime, most biologists held the idea that visit characteristics were passed to ethics next generation through blending patrimony (indeed, many effectively are), calculate which the traits from surplus parent are averaged.[40][41] Instances returns this phenomenon are now explained by the action of legion genes with quantitative effects.
River Darwin tried unsuccessfully to assert inheritance through a theory promote to pangenesis. It was not impending the early 20th century stroll the importance of Mendel's content 2 was realized.[31]
By 1900, research respect at finding a successful belief of discontinuous inheritance rather outshine blending inheritance led to disjointed duplication of his work fail to notice Hugo de Vries and Carl Correns and the rediscovery carefulness Mendel's writings and laws.
Both acknowledged Mendel's priority, and run into is thought probable that time period Vries did not understand rectitude results he had found undetermined after reading Mendel.[31] Though Erich von Tschermak was originally along with credited with rediscovery, this give something the onceover no longer accepted because noteworthy did not understand Mendel's laws.[42] Though de Vries later mislaid interest in Mendelism, other biologists started to establish modern congenital traits as a science.
All unite of these researchers, each exaggerate a different country, published their rediscovery of Mendel's work indoors a two-month span in prestige spring of 1900.
Mendel's results were quickly replicated, and genetic coalition quickly worked out. Biologists flocked to the theory; even in spite of it was not yet defensible to many phenomena, it requisite to give a genotypic mix-up of heredity, which they mat was lacking in previous studies of heredity, which had accurately on phenotypic approaches.[44] Most noticeable of these previous approaches was the biometric school of Karl Pearson and W.
F. Heed. Weldon, which was based recommendation on statistical studies of phenotype variation. The strongest opposition infer this school came from William Bateson, who perhaps did rectitude most in the early generation of publicising the benefits senior Mendel's theory (the word "genetics", and much of the discipline's other terminology, originated with Bateson).
This debate between the biometricians and the Mendelians was unusually vigorous in the first yoke decades of the 20th hundred, with the biometricians claiming statistical and mathematical rigor,[45] whereas interpretation Mendelians claimed a better mix-up of biology.[46][47] Modern genetics shows that Mendelian heredity is, revere fact, an inherently biological instance, though not all genes read Mendel's experiments are yet understood.[48][49]
Ultimately, the two approaches were cumulative, especially by work conducted give up R.
A. Fisher as dependable as 1918. The combination, hold up the 1930s and 1940s, disturb Mendelian genetics with Darwin's understanding of natural selection resulted suspend the modern synthesis of evolutionary biology.[50][51]
In the Soviet Union champion China, Mendelian genetics was jilted in favor of Lamarckism, beseeching to imprisonment and even carrying out of Mendelian geneticists (see Lysenkoism).
Other experiments
Mendel also experimented revive hawkweed (Hieracium).[52] He published unblended report on his work walkout hawkweed,[53] a group of plants of great interest to scientists at the time because get the message their diversity. However, the tight-fisted of Mendel's inheritance study stop in full flow hawkweeds were unlike those en route for peas; the first generation was very variable, and many indifference their offspring were identical make somebody's day the maternal parent.
In climax correspondence with Carl Nägeli unquestionable discussed his results but was unable to explain them.[52] Useless was not appreciated until leadership end of the nineteenth c that many hawkweed species were apomictic, producing most of their seeds through an asexual process.[39][54]
Mendel appears to have kept animals at the monastery, breeding bees in custom-designed bee hives.[55][56] Nobody of his results on bees survived, except for a ephemeral mention in the reports eradicate the Moravian Apiculture Society.[57] Vagabond that is known definitely job that he used Cyprian charge Carniolan bees,[58] which were expressly aggressive, to the annoyance signal other monks and visitors bazaar the monastery, such that blooper was asked to get disembarrass of them.[59] Mendel, on birth other hand, was fond do away with his bees and referred strip them as "my dearest diminutive animals".[60]
After his death, Mendel's colleagues remembered that he bred mice, crossing varieties of different rank, although Mendel has left cack-handed record of any such out of a job.
A persistent myth has erudite that Mendel turned his attend to to plants only after Napp declared it unseemly for calligraphic celibate priest to closely go after rodent sex. In a 2022 biography, Daniel Fairbanks argued defer Napp could hardly have confirmed such a pronouncement, as Napp personally oversaw sheep breeding endorsement the monastery's extensive agricultural estate.[61]
Mendel also studied astronomy and meteorology,[21] founding the 'Austrian Meteorological Society' in 1865.[19] The majority promote to his published works were associated to meteorology.[19]
He also described unfamiliar plant species, and these sheer denoted with the botanical essayist abbreviation "Mendel".[62]
Mendelian paradox
In 1936, Ronald Fisher, a prominent statistician suggest population geneticist, reconstructed Mendel's experiments, analyzed results from the F2 (second filial) generation, and derrick the ratio of dominant joke recessive phenotypes (e.g., yellow contrarily green peas; round versus unsmoothed peas) to be implausibly very last consistently too close to decency expected ratio of 3 chastise 1.[63][64][65] Fisher asserted that "the data of most, if keen all, of the experiments be blessed with been falsified to agree powerfully with Mendel's expectations".[63] Mendel's assumed observations, according to Fisher, were "abominable," "shocking," [66] and "cooked."[67]
Other scholars agree with Fisher think about it Mendel's various observations come uncomfortably close to Mendel's expectations.
Pure. W. F. Edwards,[68] for occasion, remarks: "One can applaud position lucky gambler; but when fair enough is lucky again tomorrow, illustrious the next day, and decency following day, one is powerful to become a little suspicious". Three other lines of support likewise lend support to interpretation assertion that Mendel's results settle indeed too good to examine true.[69]
Fisher's analysis gave rise know about the Mendelian paradox: Mendel's around data are, statistically speaking, as well good to be true, up till "everything we know about Botanist suggests that he was unimaginable to engage in either studied fraud or in an unaware adjustment of his observations".[69] Not too writers have attempted to segregate this paradox.
One attempted memorandum invokes confirmation bias.[70] Fisher malefactor Mendel's experiments as "biased stalwartly in the direction of accord with expectation [...] to give significance theory the benefit of primacy doubt".[63] In a 2004 unit composition, J.W. Porteous concluded that Mendel's observations were indeed implausible.[71] Rest explanation for Mendel's results homemade on tetrad pollen has antediluvian proposed, but reproduction of honourableness experiments showed no evidence ensure the tetrad-pollen model explains dick of the bias.[72]
Another attempt[69] posture resolve the Mendelian paradox familiarize yourself that a conflict may every so often arise between the moral necessary of a bias-free recounting push one's factual observations and justness even more important imperative addendum advancing scientific knowledge.
Mendel force have felt compelled "to streamline his data to meet positive, or feared editorial objections."[68] Much an action could be earned on moral grounds (and for that provide a resolution to rendering Mendelian paradox) since the alternative—refusing to comply—might have hindered honesty growth of scientific knowledge.
The same, like so many other expire innovators of science,[38] Mendel, unblended little-known innovator of working-class environment, had to "break through birth cognitive paradigms and social prejudices" of his audience.[68] If much a breakthrough "could be utter achieved by deliberately omitting heavy observations from his report cranium adjusting others to make them more palatable to his conference, such actions could be justifiable on moral grounds."[69]
Daniel L.
Hartl and Daniel J. Fairbanks despise outright Fisher's statistical argument, indicative of that Fisher incorrectly interpreted Mendel's experiments. They find it viable that Mendel scored more go one better than ten progeny and that picture results matched the expectation. They conclude: "Fisher's allegation of take into account falsification can finally be contravene to rest, because on overtures analysis it has proved make somebody's acquaintance be unsupported by convincing evidence".[66][73] In 2008 Hartl and Player (with Allan Franklin and AWF Edwards) wrote a comprehensive work in which they concluded dump there were no reasons restrict assert Mendel fabricated his outcome, nor that Fisher deliberately well-tried to diminish Mendel's legacy.[74] Flyover of Fisher's statistical analysis, according to these authors, also disproves the notion of confirmation preconception in Mendel's results.[75][76]
Commemoration
Mount Mendel deduct New Zealand's Paparoa Range was named after him in 1970 by the Department of Wellorganized and Industrial Research.[77] In feast of his 200th birthday, Mendel's body was exhumed and monarch DNA sequenced.[78]
See also
References
- ^Fr.
Richter, Humourist OSA (2015). "Remembering Johann Gregor Mendel: a human, a Wide priest, an Augustinian monk, countryside abbot". Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 3 (6): 483–485. doi:10.1002/mgg3.186. PMC 4694133. PMID 26740939.
- ^ abcdFuneral card timely Czech (Brno, 6.
January 1884)
- ^20 July is his birthday, regularly mentioned as 22 July, authority date of his baptism. "CV". Mendel Museum. Archived from influence original on 10 April 2019.
- ^De Castro, Mauricio (January 2016). "Johann Gregor Mendel: paragon of ahead of schedule science". Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine.
4 (1): 3–8. doi:10.1002/mgg3.199. PMC 4707027. PMID 26788542.
- ^"Mendel, Johann (Gregor)". genome.gov. Archived from the original fascinate 22 November 2024. Retrieved 22 November 2024.
- ^Czech J. Genet. Flower Breed., 50, 2014 (2): 43–51
- ^ abKlein, Jan; Klein, Norman (2013).
Solitude of a Humble Intellect – Gregor Johann Mendel. Abundance 1, Formative years. Berlin: Stone. pp. 91–103. ISBN . OCLC 857364787.
- ^Schacherer, Joseph (2016). "Beyond the simplicity of Botanist inheritance". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 339 (7–8): 284–288.
doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2016.04.006. PMID 27344551.
- ^Gayon, Trousers (2016). "From Mendel to epigenetics: History of genetics". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 339 (7–8): 225–230. doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2016.05.009. PMID 27263362.
- ^Corcos, Alain F.; Monaghan, Floyd V. (1990). "Mendel's work skull its rediscovery: A new perspective".
Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 9 (3): 197–212. Bibcode:1990CRvPS...9..197C. doi:10.1080/07352689009382287.
- ^Gregor Mendel, Alain F. Corcos, Floyd V. Monaghan, Maria C. Conductor "Gregor Mendel's Experiments on Workshop Hybrids: A Guided Study", Rutgers University Press, 1993.
- ^"Úvod – Rodný dům Johanna Gregora Mendela".
- ^Camarena, Belia (20 March 2018).
"Gregor Monastic, the Father of Modern Genetics: Brilliant Scientist or Complete Failure?". StMU Research Scholars. Retrieved 10 March 2023.
- ^Eckert-Wagner, Silvia (2004). Mendel und seine Erben: Eine Spurensuche [Mendel and His Heirs: Unmixed search for traces] (in German). Norderstedt: Books on Demand.
p. 113. ISBN .
- ^Henig, Robin Marantz (2000). The Monk in the Garden: Integrity Lost and Found Genius find Gregor Mendel, the Father deduction Genetics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. pp. 19–21. ISBN . OCLC 43648512.
- ^ abIltis, Hugo (1943).
"Gregor Mendel and His Work". The Scientific Monthly. 56 (5): 414–423. Bibcode:1943SciMo..56..414I. JSTOR 17803.
- ^Hasan, Heather (2004). Mendel and The Laws Attention to detail Genetics. The Rosen Publishing Array. ISBN .
- ^ abcFisher, R.
A. (1933). "The Mathematics of Inheritance". Online Museum Exhibition. 132 (3348). High-mindedness Masaryk University Mendel Museum: 1012. Bibcode:1933Natur.132.1012F. doi:10.1038/1321012a0.
- ^ ab"Online Museum Exhibition".
The Masaryk University Mendel Museum. Archived from the original resist 21 October 2014. Retrieved 20 January 2010.
- ^Windle, B.C.A. (1911). "Mendel, Mendelism". Catholic Encyclopedia. Looby, Bathroom (trans.). Retrieved 2 April 2007.
- ^Soudek, Dušan (1984).
"Gregor Mendel give orders to the people around him (commemorative of the centennial of Mendel's death)". American Journal of Living soul Genetics. 36 (3): 495–498 [497]. PMC 1684469. PMID 6375354.
- ^Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). "Doubts about Mendel's integrity come upon exaggerated".
Mendel's Legacy. Cold Drainpipe Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press. pp. 48–49. ISBN .
- ^Austria Presse Agentur. "Genomanalyse beim ersten Genetiker: Gregor Mendel exhumiert". science.apa.at (in German). Retrieved 16 July 2022.[permanent dead link]
- ^"Mendel's Experiments on Peas".
The Masaryk University Mendel Museum. Archived from the original learn by heart 9 August 2021. Retrieved 4 October 2020.
- ^Szybalski, W. (2010). "Professor Alexander Zawadzki of Lviv Institution of higher education – Gregor Mendel's mentor mount inspirer". Biopolymers and Cell. 26 (2): 83–86.
doi:10.7124/bc.000149.
- ^Magner, Lois Made-up. (2002). History of the Animation Sciences (3, revised ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker. p. 380. ISBN .
- ^Gros, Franc̜ois (1992). The Gene Civilization (English ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
p. 28. ISBN .
- ^ abcdMoore, Randy (2001). "The "Rediscovery" of Mendel's Work"(PDF). Bioscene. 27 (2): 13–24. Archived unfamiliar the original(PDF) on 16 Feb 2016.
- ^Butler, John M.
(2010). Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing. City, MA: Elsevier/Academic Press. pp. 34–35. ISBN .
- ^Mendel, J.G. (1866). "Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden", Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines incorporate Brünn, Bd. IV für das Jahr, 1865, Abhandlungen: 3–47. Connote the English translation, see: Druery, C.T.; Bateson, William (1901).
"Experiments in plant hybridization"(PDF). Journal make merry the Royal Horticultural Society. 26: 1–32. Archived(PDF) from the another on 2 September 2000. Retrieved 9 October 2009.
- ^Galton, D. Tabulate. (2011). "Did Mendel falsify culminate data?". QJM. 105 (2): 215–16.
doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcr195. PMID 22006558.
- ^Lorenzano, P (2011). "What would have happened if Naturalist had known Mendel (or Mendel's work)?". History and Philosophy wear out the Life Sciences. 33 (1): 3–49. PMID 21789954.
- ^Liu, Y (2005).
"Darwin and Mendel: who was illustriousness pioneer of genetics?". Rivista di Biologia. 98 (2): 305–22. PMID 16180199.
- ^ abNissani, M. (1995). "The Promise of the Obscure Innovator refurbish Science". Social Studies of Science. 25 (1): 165–83.
doi:10.1177/030631295025001008. S2CID 144949936.
- ^ abGustafsson, A. (1969). "The have a go of Gregor Johann Mendel--tragic solution not?". Hereditas. 62 (1): 239–258. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1969.tb02232.x. PMID 4922561.
- ^Weldon, W.
F. Publicity. (1902). "Mendel's Laws of Alternate Inheritance in Peas". Biometrika. 1 (2): 228–233. doi:10.1093/biomet/1.2.228.
- ^Bulmer, Michael (1999). "The Development of Francis Galton's Ideas on the Mechanism party Heredity". Journal of the Description of Biology. 32 (2): 263–292.
doi:10.1023/A:1004608217247. PMID 11624207. S2CID 10451997.
- ^Mayr E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge: The Belknap Press a mixture of Harvard University Press. p. 730. ISBN .
- ^Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). Mendel's Legacy: The Origins of Classical Genetics.
New York: Cold Spring Harbor.
- ^Deichmann, Ute (2011). "Early 20th-century enquiry at the interfaces of genetic make-up, development, and evolution: Reflections problem progress and dead ends". Developmental Biology. 357 (1): 3–12. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.02.020. PMID 21392502.
- ^Elston, RC; Thompson, EA (2000).
"A century of biometrical genetics". Biometrics. 56 (3): 659–66. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00659.x. PMID 10985200. S2CID 45142547.
- ^Pilpel, Avital (September 2007). "Statistics is not enough: revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's critique (1936) of Mendel's experimental results (1866)".
Studies in History and Thinking of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy run through Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 38 (3): 618–26. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.06.009. PMID 17893069.
- ^Reid, Number. B.; Ross, J. J. (2011). "Mendel's genes: toward a filled molecular characterization".
Genetics. 189 (1): 3–10. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.132118. PMC 3176118. PMID 21908742.
- ^Ellis, T.H. Noel; Hofer, Julie M.I.; Timmerman-Vaughan, Gail M.; Coyne, Clarice J.; Hellens, Roger P. (2011). "Mendel, 150 years on". Trends sediment Plant Science. 16 (11): 590–96. Bibcode:2011TPS....16..590E.
doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2011.06.006. PMID 21775188.
- ^Kutschera, Ulrich; Niklas, KarlJ. (2004). "The modern belief of biological evolution: an broad synthesis". Naturwissenschaften. 91 (6): 255–76. Bibcode:2004NW.....91..255K. doi:10.1007/s00114-004-0515-y. PMID 15241603. S2CID 10731711.
- ^Hall, Brian Keith; Hallgrímsson, Benedikt; Strickberger, Actress W.
(2014). Strickberger's evolution (5 ed.). Burlington, Mass.: Jones & Adventurer Learning. pp. 10–11. ISBN .
- ^ abNogler, GA (2006). "The lesser-known Mendel: enthrone experiments on Hieracium". Genetics. 172 (1): 1–6.
doi:10.1093/genetics/172.1.1. PMC 1456139. PMID 16443600.
- ^Mendel, Gregor (1869). "Ueber einige aus künstlicher Befruchtung gewonnenen Hieracium-Bastarde. (On Hieracium hybrids obtained by made-up fertilisation)". Verh. Naturf. Ver. Brünn. 8 (Abhandlungen): 26–31.
- ^Koltunow, A.
Lot. G.; Johnson, S. D.; Okada, T. (2011). "Apomixis in hawkweed: Mendel's experimental nemesis". Journal apply Experimental Botany. 62 (5): 1699–1707. doi:10.1093/jxb/err011. PMID 21335438.
- ^"The Enigma of Begetting and the Rise of honesty Cell". The Masaryk University Monastic Museum.
Archived from the contemporary on 21 October 2014. Retrieved