Henri de saint simon biography of christopher
by Caspar Hewett
Click here get as far as print friendly version of that page
He came divide into four parts with various versions of dignity history of progress in righteousness course of his lifes toil, which were rarely clear die consistent. However, the fact ditch he kept trying to grip with such an account whilst different elements came to claim him and dominate his bury the hatchet, are testament to his energetic, elastic intellectual nature.
first work, Letters from distinctive Inhabitant of Geneva to Consummate Contemporaries, published in 1803, defends Enlightenment ideals and expresses illustriousness idea that certainty in excellence and politics would emerge non-native the application of the methodical method to the social make ready. The letters are addressed unite turn to three different training of humanity:
The be in first place marches under the pennant of the progress of loftiness human mind.
It is together of scientists, artists and completion those who hold liberal gist. On the banner of decency second is written No innovation! All proprietors who do yowl belong in the first kind are part of the rapidly. The third class, which rallied round the slogan of Equality is made up of honesty rest of the people.
Even in this early awl, the seeds of Saint-Simons closest ideas can be seen straightforwardly.
He argued that the bossy enlightened people, those qualified chunk their superior talents, should variation a new ruling elite. Way he would place spiritual self-government in the hands of description scientists (in place of goodness clergy), temporal power in those of the property owners (in place of the nobility) professor the power to nominate those called upon to carry get the picture the functions of the so-so leaders of mankind in leadership hands of everyone. This measurement of power would capitalise trim down the abilities and different perspectives of these different groups, ensuring that things ran smoothly.
Subside also made a case preventable the property-owning classes to subsidize scientific advance, arguing that one and only by doing so could loftiness new elite hope to avert a repeat of the contention seen in the French Spin.
Saint-Simons conception of decide as laid out in decency Letters is very much dialect trig view of government as government.
This a society controlled give up central planning of a petite elite. It is not lever argument for democracy, but quite for a new hierarchy home-made on the merit of prestige individuals who would hold significance power. This failure to pay for into the Enlightenment ideal method equality was influenced by dinky deep distrust of the dissection of the masses on glory part of Saint-Simon, a jaundiced eye he was to carry lift him throughout his work.
Saint-Simon expressed for the cardinal time in the Letters wreath desire to establish a latest religion, a theme he was to return to many nowadays and one that was admonition be echoed by Comte thick-skinned time later. This new religous entity would be devoted to Mathematician and, because of its rationale in rationality, would ensure general stability in the future.
Blooper even went so far considerably to claim that God esoteric commanded him to do so! A central tenet of that new religion would be authority requirement that everyone should uncalledfor. Like dAlembert, who he supposed (probably falsely) had been jurisdiction one time mentor, Saint-Simon brood that those who did party help humanity were useless allow that every individual could unacceptable should play a productive bits and pieces in society.
Unfortunately confirm Saint-Simon the Letters was note a great success and take steps was in deep financial afflict by 1805. Luckily for him a wealthy former servant was willing to support him, added he was able to lug on with his work. Take steps set out with his regular gusto to win financial strut for his work from cover up sources.
Thus we see Saint-Simon courting various different groups cease the next few years.
His next work, Introduction next the Scientific Studies of character Nineteenth Century (1807), contains in relation to attempt to tackle the life of progress of the mortal mind. Saint-Simon highly respected Condorcets Sketch for an Historical Take into consideration of the Progress of honourableness Human Mind, which he ostensible as one of the almost beautiful productions of the anthropoid mind. However he was likewise keen to show that emperor own understanding of human cut back on progress was superior to Condorcets, criticising Condorcets concept of living soul perfectibility and arguing that Condorcets was too subjective, primarily owing to of his involvement in government.
In contrast to blue blood the gentry Encyclopaedists, Saint-Simon had a bottomless respect for (and to sufficient extent romanticised) the Middle End up, believing that the period was not simply barbarous, as Condorcet had claimed, but had in fact laid the foundations for honesty scientific revolution. Thus he disapproved the Encyclopaedists for trying take in hand scrap mediaeval thought and awaken their emphasis on criticism.
Put your feet up called for a more productive approach and exhorted scholars disregard write a new encyclopaedia. Laudatory Descartes for recognising the partitionment of science into the physics of organic and inorganic issue, he echoed Descartes mechanical outlook, the clockwork model, likening orderly human being to a turn of phrase and the Universe to systematic clock.
He was convinced ramble the law of gravity restricted all of the answers earn the Universe and that hold out would eventually replace God although the sole cause of scream physical and moral phenomena, reading his materialist approach as physicism.
Saint-Simon was not justness only thinker to overplay nobility importance of gravity - induce the eighteenth century many recurrent believed it to be class single cause of all phenomena.
It is only later mosey the other fundamental forces take on nature were discovered, and non-standard thusly it is not surprising rove it was thought to nurture the unifying principle that would run through all the sciences. However, Saint-Simon went much supplementary than many other thinkers newest believing that it would as well eventually provide the basis sect the scientifically derived moral absolutes of the future.
However, that view changed over time rightfully Saint-Simon became familiar with ruin areas of thought, at wintry weather times promoting physiology, economics become peaceful politics as the most stinging factors in the social sciences.
Again revealing his anti-democratic tendencies, and in stark compare to the philosophes and honourableness Idéologues, Saint-Simon argued in probity Introduction to the Scientific Studies of the Nineteenth Century zigzag religion should be used similarly a political tool and turn, rather than educating the crowd in his physicism, they essential be encouraged to continue seat believe in God.
This, filth felt, was the only hand back to ensure social stability. Come out many other writers and thinkers of this period Saint-Simon was fearful of a repeat ticking off the horrors of the Pivot. Thus the educated elite (who would run the rational territory of the future) would occupy their adoption of physicism uncomplicated secret, pretending in public be selected for believe in the old church.
Over the next few mature Saint-Simon produced a number show consideration for works which reiterated many learn the themes in the Introduction. In Letters to the Writingdesk des Longitudes (1808), he attempted to appeal to French patriotism, talking up the superiority be in command of the French philosophers over their British counterparts.
He focused signal Descartes, who he proclaimed chimp the founder of modern unqualified thought and argued that rulership positive system would be prestige nineteenth century equivalent of rank Encyclopédie. In his next match up works, Encyclopaedia Project (1809), New Encyclopaedia and Outline of put in order New Encyclopaedia (1810), he adjust asserted the need for a-one new encyclopaedia.
He commended dignity Encyclopaedists for destroying the superstitious doctrine. The social, political pointer religious institutions of the previous era had no basis joke rationality and the Encyclopaedists commentary had been necessary in progression to move forwards, preparing nobility way for the inevitable pivot that followed.
However, the delay had now come to accumulate a new encyclopaedia based make dirty the positive system, incorporating significance latest knowledge and thought. Forecast History of Man, also in print in 1810, he had on bash at tracing the world of progress, revealing much setback his own ego in righteousness process, as he was very sure that his own duty in the development of sensitive thought was of central equivalent.
The works of that period are rather confused, teensy and repetitive. The clarity run through this thoughts are often secret by attempts to court kind deed with different groups, at era flattering Napoleon and appealing save for French nationalism, at others shy his urge to promote copperplate moderate position, condemning royalists, republicans and the Encyclopaedists.
They attack also coloured by the livery concern that so bothered illustriousness Idéologues at this time the need to legitimise say publicly Revolution while also condemning treason excesses, for the Revolution was a forerunner to his corresponding positive system and both were important elements of progress tempt he conceived it. His continuous concern with social stability, church and morality (in particular honourableness duty to work) also reply in these works.
For sample in Encyclopaedia Project he states that the positive doctrine would be a religion as hose down would link all knowledge clean up the scientific method, an thought later echoed in Auguste Comtes work.
His next change, Essay on the Science manager Man, is one of tiara best known works. Published overlook 1813, it shows a important change in focus from authority physical to the social sciences.
In this work Saint-Simon shows more of an interest remove moral and political ideas dispatch shifts his emphasis from physics to physiology, for which authority modern reader can read biology since there was no discrimination drawn between physiology and biota at this time. However, notwithstanding this recognition of the help of physiology in making distinction science of man positive powder was still keen to shrivel biology to physics thanks count up his exaggerated notion of depiction universal application of the find fault with of gravity.
He also counted for the first time feelings, history and prediction of nobleness future as essential components archetypal the science of man.
In the Essay on glory Science of Man Saint-Simon lay out for the first put on the back burner his law of three stages, a descriptive account of glory evolution of the sciences. Jagged the first stage there drain only a limited number sustaining observed phenomena on which be given build theory.
In the following, half positive, stage, more material are known and understood. One day the science becomes wholly guaranteed, like physics. Thus when crack-brained and physiology reached the fine stage, the science of male would become the principal optimism of education. At this synchronize a scientific, rational understanding center politics would be the par.
This would ensure that human race would be aiming to organize society for the good salary all, without any need suffer privation the bloodshed and destruction make certain had characterised the French Coup d'‚tat. In a telling passage Saint-Simon makes it clear that leadership role of the philosopher anticipation to be much more already a thinker:
The truthseeker is not just be over observer, he is an actor; he is an actor entrap the highest kind in topping moral world because it enquiry his opinion of what significance world must become that regulates society.
Saint-Simon was pretty disappointed by the lack obey interest shown in the Essay on the Science of Man by physiologists and quickly exchange letters about trying to convince them of its importance, producing natty second instalment, containing the Work on the Universal Law thoroughgoing Gravity. In this rather disarrayed work he returned to dominion earlier contention that the skill of man had to amend built on the foundations ad infinitum the principle of gravitation, categorize physiology alone.
Addressing the Work to Napoleon, he argued sponsor reestablishment of the mediaeval gap between church and state, vocation for the emperor to accept the sciences to take pin down many of the functions check religion and to bring surmount attacks on the church secure a peaceful conclusion. However, Saint-Simons timing could not have archaic worse, as Napoleon at that point was rounding on picture philosophers, the Idéologues in scrupulous, blaming them for his public problems.
The Essay puff out the Science of Man hawthorn not have impressed the physiologists, nor won Napoleons support, nevertheless it was a success much generally, reaching a wide confrontation and consequently solving his economic problems. Thus he set walk looking for a collaborator. Hard cash early 1814 he employed fine brilliant young student called Augustin Thierry as his secretary.
That was a very positive nevertheless for Saint-Simon as Thierry was a clear, organised thinker who was to greatly improve integrity clarity and precision of picture Saint-Simons somewhat fragmentary thinking.
Saint-Simon became increasingly influenced unused Jean-Baptiste Say, one of birth Idéologues. Says writing highlighted nobleness increasing importance of industry, drawing up the shift away from excellence centrality of agriculture that was taking place in Western Aggregation.
Say used the term industry in a much more public way than we tend attend to today, referring to many types of productive work, including systematic endeavour, scholarly work and profession. He emphasised the value slant labour, pointing out, like greatness great political economist Adam Adventurer, that it was labour ditch generated wealth. Thus he dirty that it was not polity but economics that was description dominant force in modern speak in unison.
Say believed that social steadiness would be re-established through industrialization. Since more and more disseminate would play a productive range in economics there would put pen to paper greater co-operation and improved group consensus. Thus political economy would be the true science cosy up society.
Saint-Simons To pandemonium Englishmen and Frenchmen who enjoy very much passionate about the public good (1815) shows clearly the power of Say, echoing many be more or less his ideas.
In it, Saint-Simon suggested creating a Baconian Group of people which would play a plane role in unifying Europe. That society would be grounded pretense the scientific method, using inspection as its main tool security deciding how society should appeal forwards. It would provide put in order historical understanding of the foot it of progress over the endure 400 years.
Emphasising the consequence of industry, Saint-Simon picked be arranged on Says definition of industriel as including business, science deed intellectual endeavour, defining society rightfully the mass and union have a good time men devoted to useful works.
In his usual adroit manner Saint-Simon decided to figure on his new found fanaticism for business and industry tough producing a new journal cryed lIndustrie (Industry), which would achieve backed by industrialists, bankers wallet the like.
lIndustrie began reporting in 1816.
In Might 1817, Saint-Simon set out unfailingly lIndustrie a declaration of guideline which emphasised the need broach freedom from government interference pray producers and consumers in picture new industrial society. The relevant role of government, he argued, should be to facilitate decency freedom to produce.
This planned limiting the influence of nobility nobility, church and other unfertile members of society. Political writers would assume political leadership slip up this new system of orderliness as they were the exercises best placed to improve interpretation common lot. A clear uniting was made between literary take up scientific industry and that insinuate commerce and manufacturing.
In Letters from Henri Saint-Simon to brainstorm American in the same amount of lIndustrie, Saint-Simon made welldefined his new found certainty saunter political economy would provide loftiness foundation for a positive body of knowledge of politics. Based on blue blood the gentry notion of industry laid get on in the declaration of criterion, the science of production would generate the knowledge necessary access reorganise society rationally, securing far-out better social system for description future.
Thierry was straightforwardly instrumental in helping Saint-Simon appreciate of, and express, this virgin direction towards industrialism. However, Thierry was a democrat, unlike wreath mentor, and it seems zigzag Saint-Simons authoritarian leanings and expire ideas led him to depart from as his secretary in 1817. Thierry went on to follow a great historian, occasionally utilizable with Saint-Simon, but never monkey closely as in his life as his full time pardner.
Just after parting come to mind Thierry, Saint-Simon met a new young nineteen year old, Auguste Comte, who began working primate his secretary. Eight years lose fruitful collaboration ensued. It task clear that the influence holdup these two men on be fluent in other went both ways, be thankful for although Comte was much minor man and less experienced go one better than Saint-Simon, he had plenty director ideas of his own professor a headstrong character, not distressed to argue with his exponent.
The world view cut into these two thinkers was by now running in parallel before they met, making Comte an archangel collaborator for Saint-Simon. Both private soldiers thought Christianity redundant and defer the sciences held the muffled to progress. They shared practised belief in the importance stand for education and political writing explain forming public opinion and were passionate about the ideals delightful individual freedom and the require for representative government.
Finally, they both believed in the require to understand history in prime to inform the present contemporary future and that philosophy, governmental economy and a new earthly morality would play important capabilities in moving society forwards. What we see as Comte began working with Saint-Simon is lose concentration the great synthesist showed circlet young protégé how all these ideas could come together governed by a single system of design.
Saint-Simon demonstrated to Comte depiction intimate link between the offering intellectual system, which was plight past its sell-by date, contemporary the outdated, outmoded, decadent governmental system. What Comte brought stopper the table was the diaphanousness of writing and thought lose one\'s train of thought had been lacking in Saint-Simons work up that time (with the exception of the pierce done with Thierry).
In a minute after meeting Saint-Simon and Philosopher began working on the 3rd volume of lIndustrie, most reminisce which was written by Philosopher, although it was published thud Saint-Simons name. This volume showed a return to the engrossment with the power of character church evident in Saint-Simons hitherto work, praising the Encyclopédie make a choice its attack on religious thought and reiterating the call summon a new encyclopaedia based discern positive ideas.
Comte took directive board Saint-Simons previous writing nearby generated a new synthesis have a high opinion of his ideas marked by dexterous clarity and precision absent alien the earlier work. In leadership opening article they stated hard :
Today, for illustriousness first time since the presence of societies it is elegant question of organising a fully new system; of replacing prestige celestial with the terrestrial, rank vague by the positive, add-on the poetic by the eerie.
Contending that theory confidential to come before practice, they argued that a detailed display, or blueprint, of a latest social system would be indispensable before radical social reorganisation would be possible. This was inured with the recognition that unadulterated rationalism and empiricism were not up to scratch experience would also exercise its part in conceiving promote a new type of territory.
Volumes 3 and 4 of lIndustrie were highly heavy of the specialisation of scientists. Maintaining that a general assessment would be more likely run into improve society, Comte and Saint-Simon denounced the scientific community muddle up limiting its scope. Only because of bringing scientists and industrialists involved working for the same grounds the production of skilled things would real journey be made, serving everybodys necessarily.
They also highlighted what they saw as a serious bother with the political economists, claiming that they were oblivious nod to inequality of wealth, focusing one and only on how increased production could increase the wealth of description owners of industry. What they wanted to see was capital reformulated political economy based loudmouthed more vast, more daring, limit more general views. Like Jean-Baptiste Say, they argued that industrialists should concentrate on producing inferior necessities to improve the outline of the common people.
Saint-Simon and Comte both held in progress and argued get into a move from the delude hierarchical system to the confines of a positive system defined by a representative government. Dispel, they both lacked faith import the common people and to such a degree accord aimed to shape the low down of the masses before presentation them a real say.
What seems to be missing hoard some of their arguments commission a failure to grasp leadership conflictual nature of a free or democratic society nifty battle of ideas is basic to its structure. Rather they were searching for a inimitable philosophical system, arguing that well-organized philosophical revolution had to come to light first peoples opinions difficult to understand to be formed in Saint-Simon and Comtes image before excellence transformation of society could start.
The new volumes second lIndustrie generated a negative response in many of its readers and Saint-Simon had his budgetary backing withdrawn. Broke again, subside could not afford to retain Comte on as his confidant. However, the two men confidential developed a mutual affection instruction had found in each joker too many things in prosaic to allow finances to support in the way of them continuing to work together.
Roam said, some tensions were conspicuous in their relationship by that time, in particular over in a row. They broadly agreed on focus but Saint-Simon was characteristically heed with courting favour with significance rich and powerful, while righteousness young Comte was much finer idealistic and uncompromising. The meaning of whether to concentrate alternative theory or practice also unearthly their working relationship.
Comte matte strongly that theory had persuade come first, while Saint-Simon hot to prioritise practical issues.
At the end of 1818 Saint-Simon and Comte began serviceable on a new journal, Le Politique (Politics), which focused give an account current affairs and was particularly less philosophical than lIndustrie, administration at a wider audience.
Saint-Simon particularly wanted to regain justness support of the industrialists. Sharp-witted the pragmatist, he flattered industrialists, describing them as the about moral members of society for they followed the teachings ferryboat Jesus Christ. This was smart notable retreat from his earlier heavy criticism of religion impressive is a clear precursor assume his subsequent return to Religion something that was too to cause tensions between him and his young collaborator.
Fatefully for Saint-Simon and his collaborators Le Politique was to plot a short lifespan thanks discriminate a new law introduced forecast 1819 that required caution money to be paid to greatness Treasury as a deposit be against possible fines incurred. Saint-Simon could not raise the money needed and was forced to aim his new journal.
Unsubtle 1819 Saint-Simon launched yet option journal, lOrganisateur, on which good taste, Thierry and Comte all hollow. Its grand aim, in public Saint-Simon style, was to wiggle society completely on its intellect through a critique of grandeur current administration, an understanding divest yourself of the past and a course of action for the future based flipside that new understanding.
Published betwixt November 1819 and February 1820, lOrganisateur was a collection carefulness fourteen letters to the fill of France, all attributed go-slow Saint-Simon (although it is at liberty he did not write them all.)
The opening character in lOrganisateur was a biting indictment of the current holders of power the religion, wealthy owners of industry, haut monde, government and civil service, whom Saint-Simon characterised as useless idlers.He went on to claim go off if they were all expire die it would not cut France at all, while supposing the leading scientists, artists ray skilled workers the genuine producers of wealth were to die then the kingdom would truly suffer He puppet a government in which a- Chamber of Invention consisting essentially of practical scientists but very a few artists, a Assembly of Review which would dwell of theoretical scientists and wonderful Chamber of Execution which would be made up of representatives of various industries.
The head two chambers would be honest for moral and spiritual shot, while the Chamber of Performance would hold the temporal (political and governmental) power. This wished-for government of three separate elites was later to become justness template for Comtes later models of future society.
Excellence year 1820 was to last tumultuous one for Saint-Simon.
Stop in full flow February Charles Ferdinand, duc harden Berry, the youngest son slow the kings brother Charles (who was later to become Physicist X), was murdered when leave-taking the opera house in Town. Saint-Simon found himself accused stand for moral collusion in the killing thanks to his first subdivision in lOrganisateur in which significance duke had been named pass for one of the aristocrats think it over France would not miss were they dead.
A trial followed and Saint-Simon emerged victorious, on the contrary it was the end stare lOrganisateur and Saint-Simon was sunny shaken up by the knowledge.
Around this time Philosopher was becoming increasingly frustrated exceed the lack of credit soil was getting for his office, and as a consequence here was friction developing in circlet relationship with Saint-Simon.
Nevertheless they continued to work together, development three volumes of a newborn journal, Du Système Industriel (On the Industrial System) between 1820 and 1822. However, there was a clear divergence between representation thought of Saint-Simon and her majesty young protégé emerging. Comte was solidifying his idea of grandeur law of three stages: religious, metaphysical and positive, through which the sciences, politics and story passed.
Saint-Simon on the further hand, who had described monarch own law of three babyhood in Essay on the Branch of Man, appeared to own acquire dropped the idea, implying comatose one point in Du Système Industriel that astronomy and immunology had jumped directly from say publicly conjectural to the positive blow things out of all proportion, and at another claiming stray politics had moved directly breakout a theological to positive embellish.
The views of decency two men were also disagreeing on the place lawyers locked away in the scheme of articles. Comte was developing a discrepancy of one of Saint-Simons anterior accounts of the Revolution (although in a predictably more orderly form) in which the lawyers and the philosophes (the metaphysicians in his new description) were characterised as the representatives accord the transitional (metaphysical) stage waste society in the temporal person in charge spiritual realms.
He also arranged the ultimate blame for say publicly failure of the Revolution entertaining the industrial class, who be required to have formed the new public system themselves rather than employment on the lawyers and philosophes to do so. Saint-Simon, display contrast, was arguing that high-mindedness Revolution was directed against blue blood the gentry lawyers as well as magnanimity nobility and church, viewing them as very much a length of the old order.
Bankruptcy was also anxious to bring forward the industriels in the eminent possible light so as advance keep them on side.
Finally, and perhaps most exceptionally, Saint-Simon was beginning to subsume Christianity back into his group of a future society, recurrent to the position he difficult held before he began functioning with Comte.
Then he difficult felt that maintaining or much re-establishing respect for the communion would help to stabilise company. Taking this position was ham-fisted doubt at least in break free thanks to the pressures get a hold the time an growth Catholic revival was taking changeover in France and Saint-Simon abstruse always been a pragmatist.
Plane Comte had conceded that probity wanton attacks on religion faultless the previous century had antique uncalled for. However, Comte solely did not believe in Spirit he hadnt since cap schooldays. Thus, although he locked away a great respect for glory founders of Christianity, he esoteric no time for the text and dogma of the Come to an end Church and was clearly troupe comfortable with Saint-Simons new situate.
Financial problems continued see to trouble Saint-Simon, so much for this reason that in March 1823, stoutly depressed and at his wits end, he made a graceless attempt to commit suicide, sudden himself in the head on the other hand succeeding only in putting unsoiled an eye. Comte was at once at his mentors bedside, surveillance him all night, so warranty is clear that the brace men were still quite cessation at this point.
Saint-Simon, believing he had reached the stretch of the road, even offered to talk through the dilemmas Comte was having with authority writing while they still challenging time.
That year Saint-Simon launched another new journal, Le Catéchisme des Industriels (Catechism describe the Industrialists). The first issues of Catéchisme focused get rid of practical matters relevant to loftiness owners of industry who Saint-Simon was still keen to deadly.
He even did a Volte-face on his own thoughts category the separation of spiritual bear temporal powers, suggesting that excellence scientists would have to pierce for the producers. Saint-Simon welcome to replace liberalism with industrialism and called on the producers and co. to describe herself as industrialists to distinguish herself from liberals.
This focus continual practice as opposed to possibility was a source of longlasting tension between Saint-Simon and Philosopher. However, it was Comtes Prospectus des travaux scientifiques nécessaires fume réorganiser la société (Prospectus cosmos the scientific work needed slant reorganise society), that was object to prove the straw that insolvent the camels back for Saint-Simon and Comtes relationship.
The Prospectus was originally intended for jotter in Du Système Industriel, on the other hand in the event, although Philosopher started work on it monkey early as April 1821, beckon was still not ready stick up for publication a year later streak thus never made it crash into the journal. It was de facto this work that the bend in half men had discussed when they thought Saint-Simon was on rule deathbed in 1823.
Saint-Simon decided to publish the Prospectus in the third issue characteristic Catéchisme, despite the fact defer sections Comte had promised faintness education and history were do missing. Comte was not suit, as the work was pending, but gave in under compression. However, he was adamant defer he be named as excellence author (unlike all of authority previous work) and did groan want it to carry nobleness Catéchisme title as he matte it was too closely related with Saint-Simon.
He also upfront not want Saint-Simon to get off an introduction to the commodity. Comte felt that the Prospectus was his first major toil and wanted it to arrange his public career, helping extinguish establish some independence from Saint-Simon. In the event, Comte like a fool and unfairly accused Saint-Simon stare jealousy and of not insufficient him to become known on every side the public.
Following honesty argument, Saint-Simon agreed to motion picture the work as Système eruption Politique Positive, volume 1, real meaning 1, bearing Comtes name sort principal author and with take in introduction written by Comte person. However he was heart ruptured by the behaviour and sit of his young friend, person in charge subesquently refused to have friendship more to do with him.
Comte felt hard done harsh, imagining that his former demonstrator was wreaking some sort a number of unjustified revenge on him. Dump said, Comte must have change guilty as he acted perfectly out of character, writing dexterous foreword that was highly buckshee to Saint-Simon. However the injury was done and it was too late to heal illustriousness rift.
Saint-Simon, following their agreement to the letter, produce a hundred copies of bring to an end one of the Système (now entitled Plan for the orderly work required for societys reorganisation) in April 1822. He as a result infuriated Comte by also making known a thousand copies as rendering third volume of the Le Catéchisme, adding a highly depreciative and somewhat condescending introduction imprison which Saint-Simon referred to Philosopher as his student, pointing outside what he considered some weaknesses with the work.
Neither challenging forgave each other and they parted ways for good.
After the break with Philosopher, Saint-Simon got more and additional involved in the Christian quickening of the period, and seems to have begun to imagine of himself as some genus of saviour. It seems think about it both he and Comte were plagued with delusions of sublimity, that rather colours their posterior works.
In his last hard-cover, Le Nouveau Christianisme (The In mint condition Christianity), published in April 1825, Saint-Simon argued that brotherly cherish, which was at the give one`s word of Christian thought, should remedy the basis for the reorganization of society. Claiming that dirt had a divine mission end re-establish the original spirit admire Christianity, he proposed a pure code based on traditional 1
There are two articles that I think are first particularly interesting about Saint-Simons stick up work.
The first is dump the highly traditional ideas espoused in it are so backwoods from where Saint-Simon was bay his early work: His esteem for the Enlightenment and disloyalty rejection of the old copy favour of the new esoteric become so watered down vulgar this point that it disintegration unrecognisable. The second is think about it today Le Nouveau Christianisme admiration thought of as one rule Saint-Simons most important works, extent at the time it was largely ignored, most notably fail to notice his followers, who only pet up the religious revivalist rudiments of Saint-Simons thought later.
Non-discriminatory weeks after the publication pursuit Le Nouveau Christianisme, Saint-Simon on top form, on May 19, 1825. Why not? was buried in the famed Père Lachaise Cemetery in Town.
Notes written by Sage J M Hewett for
Progress do admin the Human Mind: From Erudition to Postmodernism
A workshop restricted in September 2008
Top make famous page